Connecticut to pay ‘safety analyst’ $150,000 for police election-related memes

The battle to find out what precisely “disinformation” is forward of November’s midterm elections is ongoing.

However the much more essential query is who decides what’s or just isn’t misinformation?

Connecticut State Thinks It Has An Reply: A ‘Safety Analyst’ whose job will probably be to supervise and on-line “handle” info.

RELATED: Democrats concern shedding Latino voters clearer than ever

New place

The New York Occasions reviews that the safety analyst will go to websites reminiscent of 4-chan, Gettr and Rumble that are described as “fringe” and “far proper”.

The analyst will then report any problematic memes or rumors they discover from different social media corporations. Assume the whiniest little brother in a crowded back-of-the-car, however this one will get paid $150,000.

The cash comes from a reserve within the state price range, which explains: “In latest election cycles, malicious overseas actors have demonstrated their motivation and skill to considerably disrupt election actions, thereby undermining belief of the general public within the equity and accuracy of elections. outcomes.”

So, along with browsing “excessive proper” web sites, the “safety analyst” can be more likely to be in search of well-known hacker Vladimir Putin.

RELATED: Hillary Clinton Compares Trump Supporters to Nazis: ‘What Occurred to These Individuals?’

Not the primary

Connecticut just isn’t the primary state both. Colorado has a “Speedy Response Cyber ​​Election Safety Unit.” This not solely oversees what occurs on-linebut in addition identifies “cyber assaults, overseas interference and disinformation campaigns”.

Different states like Arizona, California, Idaho and Oregon are taking a look at methods to counter what they think about to be misinformation on-line.

After all, seemingly non-public social media corporations have already determined what individuals are allowed to see.

Earlier this month, Google and YouTube introduced that they’d change some algorithms to advertise content material they need customers to see and limit what they don’t want customers to see.

Twitter mentioned it could give some candidates labels and publish one thing Orwellian calls “pre-bunks” to “pre-debunk” alleged “misinformation.”

In different phrases, all collectively, the Web will probably be much more managed and fewer free than lately.

RELATED: After US troopers are advised to go get meals stamps, Congress finds one other $12 billion for Ukraine

Who’s deciding ?

Whereas nearly all of People, no matter political affiliation, solely need truthful and sincere elections, the entire premise of “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and who determines what’s is extraordinarily troubling.

The Biden administration has already tried within the type of one thing known as the “Disinformation Governance Council”. In April, a girl named Nina Jancowicz was chosen to be its govt director.

Only one drawback. Jancowicz herself had been spreading disinformation by giving credence to false claims that Hunter Biden’s laptop computer was “Russian disinformation”.

She additionally mentioned of an RNC effort to recruit ballot watchers for the 2020 presidential election: “These types of nationwide requires individuals to point out up are a recipe, frankly, for the intimidation and violence”.

Correct info is one factor. The arbiter of knowledge accuracy is sort of one other factor.

Now’s the time to assist and share the sources you belief.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot of “100 Finest Political Blogs and Web sites.”