Leftists who work for Bezos and different billionaires lament that billionaires management information and data

How enjoyable should or not it’s to be Elon Musk right this moment? You are a billionaire in your early 50s, you are able to do or go the place you need, and also you now personal Twitter, one of many world’s largest social media platforms, the place your acknowledged purpose is to make it a beacon for freedom of speech.

And as a bonus, it drives the left loopy. Pinch your self.

There are numerous issues the left complains about this buy, however essentially the most ridiculous are these feigning outrage that billionaires personal information and data retailers. When did they begin caring about it? Oh sure, final evening.

As progressive journalist Glenn Greenwald has identified, “journalists” at retailers owned by billionaires like Jeff Bezos or Laurene Powell Jobs, spouse of the late Steve Jobs, are out of the blue very sad that billionaire Musk owns Twitter.

RELATED: Biden Admin sued over scholar mortgage bailout

Freedom of speech? We will not have freedom of speech!

However one of the best half is that the “consultants” have now been referred to as in to research what the impression might be of individuals on a single social media web site having the ability to truly converse their thoughts, quite than being censored.

A a latest report by Political Insider mentioned that Musk had overtly mentioned firing roughly 75% of Twitter staff.

Thus, the “consultants” decided that “though the small print of the potential layoffs stay restricted, this determination may compromise the platform’s capacity to manage false or dangerous content material, with ramifications that stretch to social points. such because the integrity of elections”.

Translation: If Musk fires three-quarters of Twitter staff, there will not be sufficient folks to, #1, see themselves because the arbiters of what is ‘unsuitable’ or ‘dangerous’, as a result of who else however a 20 or 30 one thing with a pc science diploma and no life expertise could be greatest to find out this?

And #2, not having sufficient employees to censor what folks see may have long-term opposed results like forming opinions and publishing them.

However maybe nothing sums up “consultants” like Zeve Sanderson, government director of the Middle for Social Media and Politics at New York College, who philosophized: “Content material moderation might be rather more troublesome with out the individuals who average the content material.

RELATED: MSNBC Visitor Compares Inflation Worries to Nazi Germany… Once more

The “good sort” of billionaires

As Glenn Greenwald has so aptly identified, each “journalist” who has made a profession out of the newspaper owned by Jeff Bezos, or the journal owned by Laurene Powell Jobs, apparently was in full settlement with these billionaires who direct the visitors of data. What’s the distinction?

Whereas not a lot could also be identified concerning the private political leanings of Bezos or Jobs, what is thought is that the publications they personal are left slanted. Whereas Musk is actually not conservative, he has made his views on being woke and cancel tradition identified, and his reasoning for purchasing Twitter has remained constant.

On Thursday he mentioned: “The explanation I acquired Twitter is that it is necessary for the way forward for civilization to have a typical digital public sq., the place a variety of beliefs will be debated in a wholesome manner. , with out resorting to violence.

Elon Musk’s new acquisition was stuffed with wry hilarity from those that agree with free speech for themselves and people they agree with, however not for you.

A non-billionaire defined how one turns into a billionaire.

So is it just for billionaires who advocate free speech? I am confused. One other had a public service announcement.

Nonetheless others additionally wanted clarification.

And at last, only a bit of excellent recommendation.

Now could be the time to help and share the sources you belief.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot of “100 Finest Political Blogs and Web sites.”